iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-N3 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 1823% more hashrate (25.0 vs 1.3 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3's favour. That said, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 1823% more hashrate (25.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 7% better efficiency (132 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 1684% more heat output (11,260 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 50% more home mining score (22.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.02 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$3,543 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,105 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$8,668 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N3 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 10.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (132 vs 142 J/TH).