Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Hashrate 6.6 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Hashrate 1.3 TH/s Power 185 W Efficiency 142.3 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
6.6 TH/s Hashrate 1.3 TH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 185 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 142.3 J/TH
Noise Level
9,900.0 kg Weight 2.2 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 631 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 33/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.67
Yearly -$2,015.65

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000060 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$0.44
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.92
Yearly -$144.97

Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 92% better power draw (2,400 vs 185 W). That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink BM-N1 408% more hashrate (6.6 vs 1.3 TH/s)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 92% better power draw (2,400 vs 185 W)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 61% better efficiency (364 vs 142 J/TH)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 2.2 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 1197% more heat output (8,189 vs 631 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 27% more home mining score (26.0 vs 33.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?

The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) on J/TH?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 221.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (364 vs 142 J/TH).