Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell CK-BOX

Goldshell CK-BOX

Hashrate 1.1 TH/s Power 215 W Efficiency 204.8 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Hashrate 3.0 TH/s Power 2,700 W Efficiency 900.0 J/TH

Goldshell CK-BOX vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell CK-BOX Specification Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
1.1 TH/s Hashrate 3.0 TH/s
215 W Power Consumption 2,700 W
204.8 J/TH Efficiency 900.0 J/TH
Noise Level
2,000.0 kg Weight 12,000.0 kg
734 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,212 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell CK-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000048 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.52
Daily Profit -$0.48
Monthly -$14.35
Yearly -$174.54

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Daily Revenue 0.00000138 BTC $0.11
Daily Electricity -$6.48
Daily Profit -$6.37
Monthly -$191.16
Yearly -$2,325.77

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK-BOX, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 92% better power draw (215 vs 2,700 W). The Todek Toddminer C1 PRO holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell CK-BOX — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK-BOX and Todek Toddminer C1 PRO actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Todek Toddminer C1 PRO 186% more hashrate (1.1 vs 3.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 92% better power draw (215 vs 2,700 W)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 77% better efficiency (205 vs 900 J/TH)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 83% better weight (2,000 vs 12,000 kg)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 PRO 1156% more heat output (734 vs 9,212 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell CK-BOX Metric Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
$190 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.48 Daily net profit -$6.37
-$365 Net after 1 year -$2,326
-$539 Net after 2 years -$4,652
-$714 Net after 3 years -$6,977
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell CK-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK-BOX

204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Todek Toddminer C1 PRO?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Todek Toddminer C1 PRO?

The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK-BOX and Todek Toddminer C1 PRO?

The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO runs at 900.0 J/TH — a difference of 695.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (205 vs 900 J/TH).