Goldshell CK Lite vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Lite | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Lite
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). The standout gap is 75% better power draw (1,200 vs 295 W) in the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)'s favour. The Goldshell CK Lite claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell CK Lite and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Lite 250% more hashrate (6.3 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 75% better power draw (1,200 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 14% better efficiency (190 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK Lite 307% more heat output (4,094 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK Lite | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $748 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$1,716 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$2,684 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$3,653 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK Lite or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell CK Lite vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell CK Lite or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK Lite and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 26.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (190 vs 164 J/TH).