Goldshell CK5 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK5 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| 200.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK5
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 295 W). The Goldshell CK5 claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK5 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK5 567% more hashrate (12.0 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 18% better efficiency (200 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 714% more heat output (8,189 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 31% more home mining score (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK5 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $998 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$5.33 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$2,943 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$4,887 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$6,832 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK5 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell CK5 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell CK5 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell CK5 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 36.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficiency (200 vs 164 J/TH).