Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell CK5

Goldshell CK5

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 200.0 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1

Todek Toddminer C1

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 1,380 W Efficiency 890.3 J/TH

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell CK5 Specification Todek Toddminer C1
12.0 TH/s Hashrate 1.6 TH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 1,380 W
200.0 J/TH Efficiency 890.3 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 4,600.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,709 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell CK5

Daily Revenue 0.00000552 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.33
Monthly -$159.84
Yearly -$1,944.67

Todek Toddminer C1

Daily Revenue 0.00000071 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$3.26
Monthly -$97.69
Yearly -$1,188.51

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK5, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 674% more hashrate (12.0 vs 1.6 TH/s). The Todek Toddminer C1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell CK5 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK5 and Todek Toddminer C1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell CK5 674% more hashrate (12.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 43% better power draw (2,400 vs 1,380 W)
  • Goldshell CK5 78% better efficiency (200 vs 890 J/TH)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 46% better weight (8,500 vs 4,600 kg)
  • Goldshell CK5 74% more heat output (8,189 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 19% more home mining score (26.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell CK5 Metric Todek Toddminer C1
$998 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.33 Daily net profit -$3.26
-$2,943 Net after 1 year -$1,189
-$4,887 Net after 2 years -$2,377
-$6,832 Net after 3 years -$3,566
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Todek Toddminer C1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK5

200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK5 or the Todek Toddminer C1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Todek Toddminer C1 is more profitable at $-3.26/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK5 or Todek Toddminer C1?

The Todek Toddminer C1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 690.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (200 vs 890 J/TH).