Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

Hashrate 16.2 GH/s Power 3,700 W Efficiency 228,395.1 J/TH
VS
Elphapex DG 2

Elphapex DG 2

Hashrate 20.0 GH/s Power 3,800 W Efficiency 190,000.0 J/TH

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs Elphapex DG 2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) Specification Elphapex DG 2
16.2 GH/s Hashrate 20.0 GH/s
3,700 W Power Consumption 3,800 W
228,395.1 J/TH Efficiency 190,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
15.6 kg Weight 18.3 kg
12,624 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,966 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
VOLCMINER Manufacturer Elphapex

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.88
Daily Profit -$8.88
Monthly -$266.38
Yearly -$3,240.99

Elphapex DG 2

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit -$9.12
Monthly -$273.58
Yearly -$3,328.54

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Elphapex DG 2 wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 23% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Elphapex DG 2 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) and Elphapex DG 2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Elphapex DG 2 23% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 3% better power draw (3,700 vs 3,800 W)
  • Elphapex DG 2 17% better efficiency (228,395 vs 190,000 J/TH)
  • VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 15% better weight (15.6 vs 18.3 kg)
  • Elphapex DG 2 3% more heat output (12,624 vs 12,966 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) Metric Elphapex DG 2
Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,680
-$8.88 Daily net profit -$9.12
-$3,241 Net after 1 year -$8,009
-$6,482 Net after 2 years -$11,337
-$9,723 Net after 3 years -$14,666
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG 2

190,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or the Elphapex DG 2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) is more profitable at $-8.88/day compared to $-9.12/day for the Elphapex DG 2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs Elphapex DG 2: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or the Elphapex DG 2?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) and Elphapex DG 2 on J/TH?

The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH while the Elphapex DG 2 runs at 190,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 38,395.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (228,395 vs 190,000 J/TH).