Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Hashrate 2.4 TH/s Power 1,000 W Efficiency 416.7 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DSM6T

iBeLink DSM6T

Hashrate 6.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 350.0 J/TH

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster vs iBeLink DSM6T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster Specification iBeLink DSM6T
2.4 TH/s Hashrate 6.0 TH/s
1,000 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
416.7 J/TH Efficiency 350.0 J/TH
Noise Level
3,600.0 kg Weight 17,600.0 kg
3,412 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Blake256r14
Innosilicon Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000110 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$2.40
Daily Profit -$2.31
Monthly -$69.41
Yearly -$844.49

iBeLink DSM6T

Daily Revenue 0.00000276 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.82
Monthly -$144.73
Yearly -$1,760.84

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink DSM6T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 150% more hashrate (2.4 vs 6.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink DSM6T's favour. The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink DSM6T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster and iBeLink DSM6T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink DSM6T 150% more hashrate (2.4 vs 6.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 52% better power draw (1,000 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink DSM6T 16% better efficiency (417 vs 350 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 80% better weight (3,600 vs 17,600 kg)
  • iBeLink DSM6T 110% more heat output (3,412 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DSM6T

350.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or the iBeLink DSM6T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster is more profitable at $-2.31/day compared to $-4.82/day for the iBeLink DSM6T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or iBeLink DSM6T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or the iBeLink DSM6T?

The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DSM6T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster and iBeLink DSM6T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster runs at 416.7 J/TH while the iBeLink DSM6T runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (417 vs 350 J/TH).