Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)

Hashrate 11.0 GH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 310,909.1 J/TH
VS
BW L21

BW L21

Hashrate 550.0 MH/s Power 950 W Efficiency 1,727,272.7 J/TH

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) vs BW L21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) Specification BW L21
11.0 GH/s Hashrate 550.0 MH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 950 W
310,909.1 J/TH Efficiency 1,727,272.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
16.1 kg Weight 5,750.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,241 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Elphapex Manufacturer BW

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$8.21
Monthly -$246.23
Yearly -$2,995.78

BW L21

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.28
Daily Profit -$2.28
Monthly -$68.40
Yearly -$832.19

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 1900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)'s favour. The BW L21 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) and BW L21 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 1900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • BW L21 72% better power draw (3,420 vs 950 W)
  • Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 82% better efficiency (310,909 vs 1,727,273 J/TH)
  • Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 5,750.0 kg)
  • Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 260% more heat output (11,669 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
  • Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) Metric BW L21
$950 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$8.21 Daily net profit -$2.28
-$3,946 Net after 1 year -$832
-$6,942 Net after 2 years -$1,664
-$9,937 Net after 3 years -$2,497
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)

310,909.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) vs BW L21: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the BW L21 is more profitable at $-2.28/day compared to $-8.21/day for the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) vs BW L21: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the BW L21 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) or the BW L21?

The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the BW L21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) and BW L21 on J/TH?

The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) runs at 310,909.1 J/TH while the BW L21 runs at 1,727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,416,363.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (310,909 vs 1,727,273 J/TH).