Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Elphapex DG1 Lite

Elphapex DG1 Lite

Hashrate 11.0 GH/s Power 3,410 W Efficiency 310,000.0 J/TH
VS
FluMiner L2

FluMiner L2

Hashrate 1.0 GH/s Power 230 W Efficiency 230,000.0 J/TH

Elphapex DG1 Lite vs FluMiner L2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Elphapex DG1 Lite Specification FluMiner L2
11.0 GH/s Hashrate 1.0 GH/s
3,410 W Power Consumption 230 W
310,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 230,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 40 dB
18.3 kg Weight
11,635 BTU/hr BTU Output 785 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 66/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Elphapex Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Elphapex DG1 Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.18
Daily Profit -$8.18
Monthly -$245.51
Yearly -$2,987.02

FluMiner L2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.55
Daily Profit -$0.55
Monthly -$16.56
Yearly -$201.47

Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the FluMiner L2 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 93% better power draw (3,410 vs 230 W). The Elphapex DG1 Lite holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: FluMiner L2 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Elphapex DG1 Lite and FluMiner L2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Elphapex DG1 Lite 1000% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • FluMiner L2 93% better power draw (3,410 vs 230 W)
  • FluMiner L2 26% better efficiency (310,000 vs 230,000 J/TH)
  • FluMiner L2 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
  • Elphapex DG1 Lite 1383% more heat output (11,635 vs 785 BTU/hr)
  • FluMiner L2 83% more home mining score (36.0 vs 66.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Elphapex DG1 Lite Metric FluMiner L2
Upfront cost (MSRP) $331
-$8.18 Daily net profit -$0.55
-$2,987 Net after 1 year -$533
-$5,974 Net after 2 years -$734
-$8,961 Net after 3 years -$936
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

FluMiner L2

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FluMiner L2

230,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Elphapex DG1 Lite vs FluMiner L2: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner L2 is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-8.18/day for the Elphapex DG1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Elphapex DG1 Lite or FluMiner L2?

The FluMiner L2 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Elphapex DG1 Lite at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Elphapex DG1 Lite or FluMiner L2?

The FluMiner L2 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Elphapex DG1 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG1 Lite and FluMiner L2?

The Elphapex DG1 Lite runs at 310,000.0 J/TH while the FluMiner L2 runs at 230,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 80,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (310,000 vs 230,000 J/TH).