Specifications Comparison
| iPollo G1 | Specification | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| 36.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 2,800 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 77,777.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 19,000.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 9,554 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cuckatoo32 | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo G1
iPollo X1
Based on BTC price of $74,273 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iPollo G1 offers 90% better efficiency at 77,777.8 J/TH compared to the iPollo X1 at 800,000.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo X1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo G177,777.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo G1 or iPollo X1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-6.72/day for the iPollo G1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo G1 or iPollo X1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo G1 or iPollo X1?
The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo G1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo G1 and iPollo X1?
The iPollo G1 runs at 77,777.8 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 722,222.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
