IceRiver KS0 vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the IceRiver KS0 and IceRiver KS3M trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 5900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 13% better efficiency (650 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 5130% more heat output (222 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the IceRiver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 or IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS0 or the IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS0 and IceRiver KS3M on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 83.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (650 vs 567 J/TH).