IceRiver KS1 vs IceRiver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
IceRiver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 700% more hashrate (1.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS3's favour. The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS1 and IceRiver KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3 700% more hashrate (1.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 81% better power draw (600 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3 33% better efficiency (600 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3 4% better weight (15.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 433% more heat output (2,047 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more home mining score (51.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$12,698 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$15,396 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$18,095 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS1 or IceRiver KS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS1 or IceRiver KS3?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs IceRiver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS1 vs IceRiver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 200.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficiency (600 vs 400 J/TH).