IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W). The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3L 150% more hashrate (5.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 61% better efficiency (640 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 65% better weight (14.4 vs 5.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 540% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$1,282 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 390.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (640 vs 250 J/TH).