Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver AL3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 7% better efficiency (233 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 69% better weight (16.0 vs 5.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (233 vs 250 J/TH).