Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH) in the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 99900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 86% better power draw (3,580 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 67% better weight (15.0 vs 5.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 616% more heat output (12,215 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 107% more home mining score (30.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,750.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH).