IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W). The IceRiver KS3M holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 1400% more hashrate (6.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 56% better efficiency (567 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (14.4 vs 2.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 3300% more heat output (11,601 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$14,300 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$17,200 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3M or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 316.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (567 vs 250 J/TH).