Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

IceRiver KS5L

IceRiver KS5L

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 283.3 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro

Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro

Hashrate 200.0 GH/s Power 100 W Efficiency 500.0 J/TH

IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

IceRiver KS5L Specification Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
12.0 TH/s Hashrate 200.0 GH/s
3,400 W Power Consumption 100 W
283.3 J/TH Efficiency 500.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
15.0 kg Weight 2.5 kg
11,601 BTU/hr BTU Output 341 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

IceRiver KS5L

Daily Revenue 0.00000552 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.73
Monthly -$231.89
Yearly -$2,821.33

Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000009 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.24
Daily Profit -$0.23
Monthly -$6.98
Yearly -$84.98

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS5L comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 5900% more hashrate (12.0 vs 0.2 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: IceRiver KS5L — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • IceRiver KS5L 5900% more hashrate (12.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W)
  • IceRiver KS5L 43% better efficiency (283 vs 500 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
  • IceRiver KS5L 3300% more heat output (11,601 vs 341 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

IceRiver KS5L Metric Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
$12,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
-$7.73 Daily net profit -$0.23
-$14,821 Net after 1 year -$164
-$17,643 Net after 2 years -$249
-$20,464 Net after 3 years -$334
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

IceRiver KS5L

283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the IceRiver KS5L or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the IceRiver KS5L or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The IceRiver KS5L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS5L or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 216.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (283 vs 500 J/TH).