Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS5L comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS5L's favour. The Iceriver AE2 720Mh holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS5L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS5L 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 62% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 283 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS5L 3% better weight (15.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 162% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more home mining score (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$14,821 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$17,642 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$20,463 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS5L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS5L?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the IceRiver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS5L?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS5L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,272.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 283 J/TH).