Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 25% more hashrate (15.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS5L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS5L actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 25% more hashrate (15.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS5L 3% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver AL3 18% better efficiency (233 vs 283 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS5L 6% better weight (16.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$14,821 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$17,642 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$20,463 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS5L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS5L is more profitable at $-7.73/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS5L?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS5L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS5L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 50.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficiency (233 vs 283 J/TH).