Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

IceRiver KS5L

IceRiver KS5L

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 283.3 J/TH
VS
Bitmain KAS KS7

Bitmain KAS KS7

Hashrate 40.0 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 77.0 J/TH

IceRiver KS5L vs Bitmain KAS KS7

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

IceRiver KS5L Specification Bitmain KAS KS7
12.0 TH/s Hashrate 40.0 TH/s
3,400 W Power Consumption 3,080 W
283.3 J/TH Efficiency 77.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
15.0 kg Weight 16.4 kg
11,601 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,509 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

IceRiver KS5L

Daily Revenue 0.00000552 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.73
Monthly -$231.84
Yearly -$2,820.76

Bitmain KAS KS7

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.95
Monthly -$178.57
Yearly -$2,172.63

Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain KAS KS7 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 73% better efficiency (283.3 vs 77.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain KAS KS7 — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The IceRiver KS5L and Bitmain KAS KS7 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain KAS KS7 233% more hashrate (12.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 9% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,080 W)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 73% better efficiency (283.3 vs 77.0 J/TH)
  • IceRiver KS5L 9% better weight (15.0 vs 16.4 kg)
  • IceRiver KS5L 10% more heat output (11,601 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

IceRiver KS5L Metric Bitmain KAS KS7
$12,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,590
-$7.73 Daily net profit -$5.95
-$14,821 Net after 1 year -$3,763
-$17,642 Net after 2 years -$5,935
-$20,462 Net after 3 years -$8,108
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain KAS KS7

77.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS5L or the Bitmain KAS KS7?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain KAS KS7 is more profitable at $-5.95/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the IceRiver KS5L or the Bitmain KAS KS7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

IceRiver KS5L vs Bitmain KAS KS7: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS5L and Bitmain KAS KS7?

The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 206.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficiency (283.3 vs 77.0 J/TH).