IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS5L | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 283.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS5L
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS5L, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 500% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KS2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS5L 500% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 65% better power draw (3,400 vs 1,200 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 53% better efficiency (283 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS2 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 183% more heat output (11,601 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 25% more home mining score (36.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS5L | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.73 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$14,821 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$17,643 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$20,464 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS5L or the Iceriver KS2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS5L or Iceriver KS2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS5L or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KS2?
The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 316.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (283 vs 600 J/TH).