Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 330.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $77,864 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-Q, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 491% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 491% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 61% better power draw (620 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 56% better efficiency (317,949 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 76% better weight (10.0 vs 2.4 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q 158% more heat output (2,115 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 2% more home mining score (65.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Jasminer X16-Q or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Jasminer X16-Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 409,324.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (317,949 vs 727,273 J/TH).