SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS1 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 600 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS1 2122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 67% better power draw (1,845 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver KS1 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 44% better weight (8.3 vs 14.9 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 207% more heat output (6,295 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 57% more home mining score (28.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the SuperScalar K10 or the Iceriver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KS1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS1 on J/TH?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 600 J/TH).