Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AL3 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 83% better power draw (3,500 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver AL3 61% better efficiency (233 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS1 7% better weight (16.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 483% more heat output (11,942 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more home mining score (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 366.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (233 vs 600 J/TH).