Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 15.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 375.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 58/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS5M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 838% more hashrate (1.6 vs 15.0 TH/s). The Goldshell KA BOX Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KA BOX Pro and Iceriver KAS KS5M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 838% more hashrate (1.6 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 40% better efficiency (375 vs 227 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 83% better weight (2.6 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 467% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 61% more home mining score (58.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$1.38 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$634 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$1,138 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$1,643 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell KA BOX Pro or the Iceriver KAS KS5M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 148.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (375 vs 227 J/TH).