Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 226.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver KAS KS5M wins on 3 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 150% more hashrate (15.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 150% more hashrate (15.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 60% better efficiency (227 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 12% better weight (15.0 vs 17.1 kg)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $449 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$7.62 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$6,012 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$8,793 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS5M is more profitable at $-7.62/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 340.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (227 vs 567 J/TH).