Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 119.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W). That said, the Iceriver KS3M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Iceriver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3M 43% more hashrate (4.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 79% better efficiency (119 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 76% better weight (4.0 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 580% more heat output (1,706 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more home mining score (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$1.05 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$1,082 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$1,848 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or the Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 447.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (119 vs 567 J/TH).