Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain KAS KS7

Bitmain KAS KS7

Hashrate 40.0 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 77.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS1

Iceriver KS1

Hashrate 1.0 TH/s Power 600 W Efficiency 600.0 J/TH

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain KAS KS7 Specification Iceriver KS1
40.0 TH/s Hashrate 1.0 TH/s
3,080 W Power Consumption 600 W
77.0 J/TH Efficiency 600.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
16.4 kg Weight 14.9 kg
10,509 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,047 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain KAS KS7

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.95
Monthly -$178.59
Yearly -$2,172.83

Iceriver KS1

Daily Revenue 0.00000046 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$1.44
Daily Profit -$1.40
Monthly -$42.12
Yearly -$512.47

Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain KAS KS7 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 3900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 1.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain KAS KS7's favour. The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain KAS KS7 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain KAS KS7 and Iceriver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain KAS KS7 3900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS1 81% better power draw (3,080 vs 600 W)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 87% better efficiency (77.0 vs 600.0 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS1 9% better weight (16.4 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 413% more heat output (10,509 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
  • Iceriver KS1 22% more home mining score (36.0 vs 44.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain KAS KS7 Metric Iceriver KS1
$1,590 Upfront cost (MSRP) $199
-$5.95 Daily net profit -$1.40
-$3,763 Net after 1 year -$711
-$5,936 Net after 2 years -$1,224
-$8,108 Net after 3 years -$1,736
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Iceriver KS1

Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain KAS KS7

77.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain KAS KS7 or the Iceriver KS1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain KAS KS7 or the Iceriver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS1: which fits a residential setup better?

The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain KAS KS7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain KAS KS7 and Iceriver KS1?

The Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 523.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (77.0 vs 600.0 J/TH).