Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD-BOX

Goldshell KD-BOX

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 205 W Efficiency 128.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD2

Goldshell KD2

Hashrate 6.0 TH/s Power 830 W Efficiency 138.3 J/TH

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD-BOX Specification Goldshell KD2
1.6 TH/s Hashrate 6.0 TH/s
205 W Power Consumption 830 W
128.1 J/TH Efficiency 138.3 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 7,300.0 kg
700 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,832 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000074 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.49
Daily Profit -$0.43
Monthly -$13.03
Yearly -$158.56

Goldshell KD2

Daily Revenue 0.00000276 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$1.99
Daily Profit -$1.78
Monthly -$53.28
Yearly -$648.25

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD-BOX edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 75% better power draw (205 vs 830 W). The Goldshell KD2 holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell KD-BOX — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell KD-BOX and Goldshell KD2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell KD2 275% more hashrate (1.6 vs 6.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 75% better power draw (205 vs 830 W)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 7% better efficiency (128 vs 138 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD2 305% more heat output (700 vs 2,832 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 11% more home mining score (31.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD-BOX Metric Goldshell KD2
$330 Upfront cost (MSRP) $828
-$0.43 Daily net profit -$1.78
-$489 Net after 1 year -$1,476
-$647 Net after 2 years -$2,125
-$806 Net after 3 years -$2,773
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell KD-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD-BOX

128.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD2: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.43/day compared to $-1.78/day for the Goldshell KD2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell KD-BOX or the Goldshell KD2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell KD-BOX or Goldshell KD2?

The Goldshell KD-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell KD2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell KD-BOX and Goldshell KD2 on J/TH?

The Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH while the Goldshell KD2 runs at 138.3 J/TH — a difference of 10.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (128 vs 138 J/TH).