Iceriver KS3 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS3 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS3
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 31% more hashrate (8.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KS3 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 31% more hashrate (8.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 11% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 14% better efficiency (400 vs 343 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 7% better weight (13.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 13% more heat output (10,918 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver KS3 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $730 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$3,428 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$6,126 | Net after 2 years | -$11,572 |
| -$8,825 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KS3 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KS3 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KS3 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS3 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 57.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (400 vs 343 J/TH).