Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Iceriver KS3

Iceriver KS3

Hashrate 8.0 TH/s Power 3,200 W Efficiency 400.0 J/TH
VS
Dragonball Miner KS6

Dragonball Miner KS6

Hashrate 11.0 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 309.1 J/TH

Iceriver KS3 vs Dragonball Miner KS6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Iceriver KS3 Specification Dragonball Miner KS6
8.0 TH/s Hashrate 11.0 TH/s
3,200 W Power Consumption 3,400 W
400.0 J/TH Efficiency 309.1 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
13.5 kg Weight 14.5 kg
10,918 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer Dragonball

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Iceriver KS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000368 BTC $0.29
Daily Electricity -$7.68
Daily Profit -$7.39
Monthly -$221.77
Yearly -$2,698.18

Dragonball Miner KS6

Daily Revenue 0.00000506 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.76
Monthly -$232.93
Yearly -$2,834.00

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Dragonball Miner KS6 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 38% more hashrate (8.0 vs 11.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS3 claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Dragonball Miner KS6 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KS3 and Dragonball Miner KS6 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Dragonball Miner KS6 38% more hashrate (8.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS3 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
  • Dragonball Miner KS6 23% better efficiency (400 vs 309 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS3 7% better weight (13.5 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Dragonball Miner KS6 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Iceriver KS3 Metric Dragonball Miner KS6
$730 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,820
-$7.39 Daily net profit -$7.76
-$3,428 Net after 1 year -$6,654
-$6,126 Net after 2 years -$9,488
-$8,825 Net after 3 years -$12,322
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Dragonball Miner KS6

309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Iceriver KS3 or the Dragonball Miner KS6?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.76/day for the Dragonball Miner KS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Iceriver KS3 or Dragonball Miner KS6?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Iceriver KS3 vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS3 and Dragonball Miner KS6?

The Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner KS6 runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 90.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficiency (400 vs 309 J/TH).