Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell LB-BOX

Goldshell LB-BOX

Hashrate 175.0 GH/s Power 162 W Efficiency 925.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell LB1

Goldshell LB1

Hashrate 87.0 GH/s Power 80 W Efficiency 919.5 J/TH

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell LB-BOX Specification Goldshell LB1
175.0 GH/s Hashrate 87.0 GH/s
162 W Power Consumption 80 W
925.7 J/TH Efficiency 919.5 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 1,100.0 kg
553 BTU/hr BTU Output 273 BTU/hr
33/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
LBRY Algorithm LBRY
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell LB-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000008 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.39
Daily Profit -$0.38
Monthly -$11.48
Yearly -$139.61

Goldshell LB1

Daily Revenue 0.00000004 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.19
Daily Profit -$0.19
Monthly -$5.67
Yearly -$68.94

Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell LB1, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 51% better power draw (162.0 vs 80.0 W). The Goldshell LB-BOX holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell LB1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell LB-BOX and Goldshell LB1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell LB-BOX 101% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Goldshell LB1 51% better power draw (162.0 vs 80.0 W)
  • Goldshell LB1 1% better efficiency (926 vs 920 J/TH)
  • Goldshell LB-BOX 102% more heat output (553 vs 273 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell LB1 9% more home mining score (33.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell LB-BOX Metric Goldshell LB1
$159 Upfront cost (MSRP) $700
-$0.38 Daily net profit -$0.19
-$299 Net after 1 year -$769
-$438 Net after 2 years -$838
-$578 Net after 3 years -$907
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell LB1

Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell LB1

919.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell LB-BOX or the Goldshell LB1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LB1 is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-0.38/day for the Goldshell LB-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell LB-BOX or Goldshell LB1?

The Goldshell LB1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell LB-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell LB-BOX runs at 925.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LB1 runs at 919.5 J/TH — a difference of 6.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (926 vs 920 J/TH).