Dragonball Miner A11 vs Iceriver RXD RX0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Dragonball Miner A11 | Specification | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 GH/s |
| 2,300 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 718.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 384.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 10 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 7,848 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Sha512256d | Algorithm | Sha512256d |
| Dragonball | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Dragonball Miner A11
Iceriver RXD RX0
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver RXD RX0 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (2,300 vs 100 W). The Dragonball Miner A11 holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Dragonball Miner A11 and Iceriver RXD RX0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Dragonball Miner A11 1131% more hashrate (3.2 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 96% better power draw (2,300 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 46% better efficiency (719 vs 385 J/TH)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 87% better noise (75.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 83% better weight (14.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner A11 2200% more heat output (7,848 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 78% more home mining score (40.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Dragonball Miner A11 | Metric | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,990 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $395 |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$3,963 | Net after 1 year | -$479 |
| -$5,936 | Net after 2 years | -$563 |
| -$7,908 | Net after 3 years | -$648 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver RXD RX0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver RXD RX0384.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Dragonball Miner A11 or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver RXD RX0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-5.40/day for the Dragonball Miner A11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Dragonball Miner A11 or the Iceriver RXD RX0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Dragonball Miner A11 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Dragonball Miner A11 or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Dragonball Miner A11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Dragonball Miner A11 vs Iceriver RXD RX0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Dragonball Miner A11 runs at 718.8 J/TH while the Iceriver RXD RX0 runs at 384.6 J/TH — a difference of 334.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficiency (719 vs 385 J/TH).