Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver RXD RX0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 384.6 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 10 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha512256d |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver RXD RX0
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver RXD RX0 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 385 J/TH) in the Iceriver RXD RX0's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver RXD RX0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver RXD RX0 36011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 92% better power draw (1,300 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 385 J/TH)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 83% better noise (60.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 84% better weight (15.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 1200% more heat output (4,436 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 37% more home mining score (52.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $395 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$479 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$563 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$648 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver RXD RX0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver RXD RX0384.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver RXD RX0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver RXD RX0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver RXD RX0 runs at 384.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,170.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 385 J/TH).