Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver RXD RX0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 GH/s |
| 3,580 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 384.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 10 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha512256d |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver RXD RX0
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver RXD RX0 wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 385 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver RXD RX0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver RXD RX0 12900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 97% better power draw (3,580 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 385 J/TH)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 87% better noise (75.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 3480% more heat output (12,215 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 137% more home mining score (30.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $395 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$479 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$563 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$648 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver RXD RX0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver RXD RX0384.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver RXD RX0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver RXD RX0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver RXD RX0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver RXD RX0 runs at 384.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,615.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 385 J/TH).