Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster

Hashrate 4.3 TH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 314.0 J/TH
VS
Obelisk SC1

Obelisk SC1

Hashrate 550.0 GH/s Power 500 W Efficiency 909.1 J/TH

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster vs Obelisk SC1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster Specification Obelisk SC1
4.3 TH/s Hashrate 550.0 GH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 500 W
314.0 J/TH Efficiency 909.1 J/TH
Noise Level
3,700.0 kg Weight 9,000.0 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,706 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
Blake2b Algorithm Blake2b
Innosilicon Manufacturer Obelisk

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000198 BTC $0.15
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.09
Monthly -$92.55
Yearly -$1,126.08

Obelisk SC1

Daily Revenue 0.00000025 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$1.20
Daily Profit -$1.18
Monthly -$35.41
Yearly -$430.77

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 682% more hashrate (4.3 vs 0.6 TH/s). That said, the Obelisk SC1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster and Obelisk SC1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster 682% more hashrate (4.3 vs 0.6 TH/s)
  • Obelisk SC1 63% better power draw (1,350 vs 500 W)
  • Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster 65% better efficiency (314 vs 909 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster 59% better weight (3,700 vs 9,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster 170% more heat output (4,606 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
  • Obelisk SC1 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster Metric Obelisk SC1
$2,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.09 Daily net profit -$1.18
-$3,126 Net after 1 year -$431
-$4,252 Net after 2 years -$862
-$5,378 Net after 3 years -$1,292
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Obelisk SC1

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster

314.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster or the Obelisk SC1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Obelisk SC1 is more profitable at $-1.18/day compared to $-3.09/day for the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster vs Obelisk SC1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster or the Obelisk SC1?

The Obelisk SC1 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster vs Obelisk SC1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster runs at 314.0 J/TH while the Obelisk SC1 runs at 909.1 J/TH — a difference of 595.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (314 vs 909 J/TH).