Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Hashrate 39.0 TH/s Power 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S

Whatsminer M50S

Hashrate 126.0 TH/s Power 3,276 W Efficiency 26.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 39T vs Whatsminer M50S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T3 39T Specification Whatsminer M50S
39.0 TH/s Hashrate 126.0 TH/s
2,150 W Power Consumption 3,276 W
55.1 J/TH Efficiency 26.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
8,650.0 kg Weight 12.8 kg
7,336 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$3.74
Monthly -$112.24
Yearly -$1,365.56

Whatsminer M50S

Daily Revenue 0.00005798 BTC $4.58
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$3.28
Monthly -$98.36
Yearly -$1,196.75

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 223% more hashrate (39.0 vs 126.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50S's favour. The Innosilicon T3 39T holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon T3 39T and Whatsminer M50S sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M50S 223% more hashrate (39.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 34% better power draw (2,150 vs 3,276 W)
  • Whatsminer M50S 53% better efficiency (55.1 vs 26.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (8,650.0 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Whatsminer M50S 52% more heat output (7,336 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M50S 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon T3 39T Metric Whatsminer M50S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$3.74 Daily net profit -$3.28
-$1,366 Net after 1 year -$4,397
-$2,731 Net after 2 years -$5,594
-$4,097 Net after 3 years -$6,790
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M50S

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S

26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon T3 39T or Whatsminer M50S more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.28/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon T3 39T or Whatsminer M50S?

The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 39T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Innosilicon T3 39T vs Whatsminer M50S: which fits a residential setup better?

The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon T3 39T vs Whatsminer M50S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 29.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (55.1 vs 26.0 J/TH).