Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X16-Q pro

Jasminer X16-Q pro

Hashrate 2.1 GH/s Power 520 W Efficiency 253,658.5 J/TH

iPollo V1 Hyd vs Jasminer X16-Q pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Hyd Specification Jasminer X16-Q pro
900.0 MH/s Hashrate 2.1 GH/s
800 W Power Consumption 520 W
888,888.9 J/TH Efficiency 253,658.5 J/TH
Noise Level 40 dB
8.0 kg Weight 10.0 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,774 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Jasminer X16-Q pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.25
Daily Profit -$1.25
Monthly -$37.44
Yearly -$455.50

Based on BTC price of $74,658 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q pro wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X16-Q pro — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-Q pro

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-Q pro

253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo V1 Hyd or Jasminer X16-Q pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-1.92/day for the iPollo V1 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Hyd or Jasminer X16-Q pro?

The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Hyd or Jasminer X16-Q pro?

The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Hyd and Jasminer X16-Q pro?

The iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 635,230.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.