iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Specification | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 840.0 MH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 340 W |
| 857,142.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 404,761.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,160 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X4 3U-Z comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 200% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4 3U-Z sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 200% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 29% better power draw (240 vs 340 W)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 53% better efficiency (857,143 vs 404,762 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 99% better weight (1,000.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 42% more heat output (819 vs 1,160 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Metric | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,299 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$579 | Net after 1 year | -$1,597 |
| -$789 | Net after 2 years | -$1,895 |
| -$1,000 | Net after 3 years | -$2,192 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 3U-ZScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 3U-Z404,761.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.82/day for the Jasminer X4 3U-Z. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or the Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
The Jasminer X4 3U-Z scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus runs at 857,142.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 3U-Z runs at 404,761.9 J/TH — a difference of 452,381.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (857,143 vs 404,762 J/TH).