iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 520 W |
| 846,153.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-Q pro edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 688% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and Jasminer X16-Q pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 688% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 58% better power draw (220 vs 520 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 70% better efficiency (846,154 vs 253,659 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 79% better weight (2.1 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 136% more heat output (751 vs 1,774 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 2% more home mining score (66.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| $650 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,249 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$1.25 |
| -$843 | Net after 1 year | -$1,704 |
| -$1,035 | Net after 2 years | -$2,160 |
| -$1,228 | Net after 3 years | -$2,615 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.25/day for the Jasminer X16-Q pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or the Jasminer X16-Q pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Jasminer X16-Q pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and Jasminer X16-Q pro on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 592,495.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficiency (846,154 vs 253,659 J/TH).