iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 330.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 GH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 550 W |
| 727,272.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 2.4 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-QE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 430% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-QE 430% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 56% better power draw (240 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 57% better efficiency (727,273 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 76% better weight (2.4 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-QE 129% more heat output (819 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 2% more home mining score (66.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$1,109 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$1,319 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$1,530 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or Jasminer X16-QE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or Jasminer X16-QE?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Jasminer X16-QE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 and Jasminer X16-QE on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 412,987.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficiency (727,273 vs 314,286 J/TH).