MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 112.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,472 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Based on BTC price of $76,751 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 51% better efficiency (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 104% more hashrate (55.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 1% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 51% better efficiency (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 1% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 127% more home mining score (22.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$6.46 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$6,157 | Net after 1 year | -$4,598 |
| -$8,514 | Net after 2 years | -$6,195 |
| -$10,871 | Net after 3 years | -$7,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)Score: 50/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) is more profitable at $-4.38/day compared to $-6.46/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 32.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficiency (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH).