Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X4-1U

Jasminer X4-1U

Hashrate 520.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 461,538.5 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4-Q

Jasminer X4-Q

Hashrate 1.0 GH/s Power 370 W Efficiency 355,769.2 J/TH

Jasminer X4-1U vs Jasminer X4-Q

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X4-1U Specification Jasminer X4-Q
520.0 MH/s Hashrate 1.0 GH/s
240 W Power Consumption 370 W
461,538.5 J/TH Efficiency 355,769.2 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 10,000.0 kg
819 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,262 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithm Etchash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X4-1U

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.23

Jasminer X4-Q

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.89
Daily Profit -$0.89
Monthly -$26.64
Yearly -$324.11

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4-Q, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X4-Q's favour. The Jasminer X4-1U holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Jasminer X4-Q — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X4-1U and Jasminer X4-Q sit on each measurable spec:

  • Jasminer X4-Q 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X4-1U 35% better power draw (240 vs 370 W)
  • Jasminer X4-Q 23% better efficiency (461,538 vs 355,769 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X4-Q 54% more heat output (819 vs 1,262 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X4-Q 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Jasminer X4-1U Metric Jasminer X4-Q
$209 Upfront cost (MSRP) $210
-$0.58 Daily net profit -$0.89
-$419 Net after 1 year -$534
-$629 Net after 2 years -$858
-$840 Net after 3 years -$1,182
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X4-Q

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X4-Q

355,769.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Jasminer X4-1U vs Jasminer X4-Q: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.89/day for the Jasminer X4-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Jasminer X4-1U vs Jasminer X4-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X4-1U or Jasminer X4-Q?

The Jasminer X4-Q scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4-1U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Jasminer X4-1U and Jasminer X4-Q on J/TH?

The Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-Q runs at 355,769.2 J/TH — a difference of 105,769.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficiency (461,538 vs 355,769 J/TH).