Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Taux de hachage 23.0 TH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS
NerdNOS

NerdNOS

Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s Puissance 12 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs NerdNOS

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Quick verdict

For most buyers the NerdNOS is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Aisen A1 Pro runs 23.0 TH/s at 95.7 J/TH; the NerdNOS runs 500.0 GH/s at 24 J/TH.

Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification NerdNOS
23.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s
2,200 W Consommation électrique 12 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 30 dB
Weight 0.2 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 41 BTU/hr
11/100 Home Mining Score 100/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer NerdNOS

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001080 BTC $0.66
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.62
Monthly -$138.72
Yearly -$1,687.78

NerdNOS

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.03
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.44
Yearly -$5.31

Based on BTC price of $60,733 and current network difficulty as of Jun 27, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the NerdNOS comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 12.0 W) in the NerdNOS's favour. The Aisen A1 Pro holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: NerdNOS — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Aisen A1 Pro and NerdNOS diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Aisen A1 Pro 4500% more hashrate (23.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • NerdNOS 99% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 12.0 W)
  • NerdNOS 75% better efficacité (95.7 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 18253% more heat output (7,506.4 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
  • NerdNOS 809% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 100.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Aisen A1 Pro Metric NerdNOS
Upfront cost (MSRP) $59
-$4.62 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$1,688 Net after 1 year -$64
-$3,376 Net after 2 years -$70
-$5,063 Net after 3 years -$75
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdNOS

Score: 100/100. 30 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdNOS

24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Foire aux questions

Which makes more money, the Aisen A1 Pro or the NerdNOS?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdNOS is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.62/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Aisen A1 Pro vs NerdNOS: which runs at a lower noise level?

The NerdNOS is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Aisen A1 Pro or NerdNOS?

The NerdNOS scores 100/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 11/100 for the Aisen A1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Aisen A1 Pro and NerdNOS on J/TH?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the NerdNOS runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 71.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (95.7 vs 24.0 J/TH).