Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Taux de hachage 500.0 MH/s Puissance 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s Puissance 620 W Efficiency 12.4 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
500.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s
960 W Consommation électrique 620 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.4 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8.1 kg Weight 5.9 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,115 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme Equihash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00002262 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$0.03
Monthly -$1.00
Yearly -$12.14

Based on BTC price of $64,311 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH) in the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster's favour. The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) claws back ground on score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon A9 ZMaster — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 9999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 35% better power draw (960 vs 620 W)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 100% better efficacité (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 27% better weight (8.1 vs 5.9 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 55% more heat output (3,276 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.30 Daily net profit -$0.03
-$1,310 Net after 1 year -$12
-$2,151 Net after 2 years -$24
-$2,992 Net after 3 years -$36
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

12.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster is more profitable at $-0.03/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster runs at 12.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,919,987.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH).