Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Taux de hachage 1.5 GH/s Puissance 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s Puissance 620 W Efficiency 12.4 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
1.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s
2,350 W Consommation électrique 620 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 12.4 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 5.9 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,115 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme Equihash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00002262 BTC $1.46
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$0.03
Monthly -$0.98
Yearly -$11.90

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,566,666.7 vs 12.4 J/TH) in the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon A9 ZMaster — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 3333233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 74% better power draw (2,350 vs 620 W)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 100% better efficacité (1,566,666.7 vs 12.4 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 279% more heat output (8,018 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 15% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$0.03
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$12
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$24
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$36
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

12.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster is more profitable at $-0.03/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

The Innosilicon A9 ZMaster scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster runs at 12.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,566,654.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,566,666.7 vs 12.4 J/TH).