Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Taux de hachage 500.0 MH/s Puissance 750 W Efficiency 1,500,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s Puissance 620 W Efficiency 12.4 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Specification Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
500.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 Ksol/s
750 W Consommation électrique 620 W
1,500,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.4 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8.1 kg Weight 5.9 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,115 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithme Equihash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$54.00
Yearly -$656.99

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00002262 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$0.04
Monthly -$1.06
Yearly -$12.88

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Innosilicon A9 ZMaster l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (1,500,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon A9 ZMaster — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 9999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 17% better power draw (750 vs 620 W)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 100% better efficacité (1,500,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 27% better weight (8.1 vs 5.9 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 21% more heat output (2,559 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Metric Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
$2,150 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$1.80 Daily net profit -$0.04
-$2,807 Net after 1 year -$13
-$3,464 Net after 2 years -$26
-$4,121 Net after 3 years -$39
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

12.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or Innosilicon A9 ZMaster more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-1.80/day for the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster runs at 12.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,987.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,500,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH).