Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer D7

Antminer D7

Taux de hachage 1,286.0 GH/s Puissance 3,148 W Efficiency 2,447.9 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer Z9

Bitmain Antminer Z9

Taux de hachage 42.0 Ksol/s Puissance 970 W Efficiency 23.1 J/TH

Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer Z9

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D7 Specification Bitmain Antminer Z9
1,286.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 42.0 Ksol/s
3,148 W Consommation électrique 970 W
2,447.9 J/TH Efficiency 23.1 J/TH
70 dB Niveau de bruit
14.4 kg Weight 4.7 kg
10,741 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,310 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme Equihash
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D7

Daily Revenue 0.00000058 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.52
Monthly -$225.53
Yearly -$2,743.99

Bitmain Antminer Z9

Daily Revenue 0.00001900 BTC $1.22
Daily Electricity -$2.33
Daily Profit -$1.11
Monthly -$33.16
Yearly -$403.50

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer Z9 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 99% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 23.1 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer Z9's favour. The Antminer D7 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer Z9 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer Z9 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain Antminer Z9 3166% more hashrate (1.3 vs 42.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer Z9 69% better power draw (3,148 vs 970 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer Z9 99% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 23.1 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer Z9 67% better weight (14.4 vs 4.7 kg)
  • Antminer D7 225% more heat output (10,741 vs 3,310 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer D7 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer D7 Metric Bitmain Antminer Z9
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.52 Daily net profit -$1.11
-$5,244 Net after 1 year -$403
-$7,988 Net after 2 years -$807
-$10,732 Net after 3 years -$1,210
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer D7

Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer Z9

23.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer D7 or Bitmain Antminer Z9 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer Z9 is more profitable at $-1.11/day compared to $-7.52/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer D7 or Bitmain Antminer Z9?

The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer Z9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D7 or the Bitmain Antminer Z9?

The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer Z9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer Z9?

The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer Z9 runs at 23.1 J/TH — a difference of 2,424.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 23.1 J/TH).