Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Antminer L9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Antminer L9 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 16,000.0 MH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 210,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.4 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Antminer L9
Based on BTC price of $63,208 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer L9 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2659% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Antminer L9 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer L9 2659% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 72% better power draw (942 vs 3,360 W)
- Antminer L9 87% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 70% better weight (4.4 vs 14.8 kg)
- Antminer L9 257% more heat output (3,214 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Antminer L9 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Antminer L9 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $6,500 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$9,443 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$12,386 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$15,330 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer L9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer L9210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Antminer L9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer L9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Antminer L9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer L9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Antminer L9: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer L9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Antminer L9 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,414,137.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH).